Every x paranoid artist thinks no y dealer will stop at selling every z ] coming into y’s possession].Ī. Every paranoid artist thinks no dealer will stop at selling every forged painting.ī. Finally, I discuss the relevance of the bare noun data in the context of another important debate-namely, whether domain restriction is a local mechanism only, or whether it can also be achieved by global means.Ĭontext: Though art dealers are entirely scrupulous, many famous artists have become paranoid due to the long-term effects of absinthe in particular, they each imagine that the otherwise scrupulous dealers are out to ruin the market value of just their paintings.Ī. Second, I advance a novel empirical argument based on the observed pragmatic behaviour of bare nouns, an argument that falsifies Stanley’s theory while providing clear evidence in support of von Fintel’s (1994). First, I assess the arguments that have been given for and against these two accounts and show that none of them is conclusive.
thesis, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, 1994), quantifiers come with covert restrictors and, as a result of this, induce domain restriction according to Stanley, by contrast, nouns, as opposed to quantifiers, come with covert restrictors. According to von Fintel (Restrictions on quantifier domaines, Ph.D. Two theories of implicit domain restriction have gained considerable prominence over the last two decades.
0 kommentar(er)
